← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 391 (not an original page number)
Unit 391 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
he latter had requested a supporting document from the
mayor’s office in Liebenau. However, this was denied him because the
Rudnerweide Mennonite Church had excommunicated him (Harms)
because of his new faith. The mayor insisted on a document of
permission from the elder of the Rudnerweide Church. Harms, who had
paid all district levies for the current year and [for whom] there were in
fact no obstacles in the way of his leaving the colony, requested that the
mayor at least give him a written statement to this effect. But even this
was refused him, and thus Harms was not able to take part in the
journey to the Kuban. Another person had to be selected in his
place— one who had previously belonged to the Gnadenfeld congregation.
Gnadenfeld, however, had rescinded the ban it had placed on all the
members who had joined our church (it had probably not imposed the
ban in the first place?). Along with Harms, Abraham Wiens was also
forced to stay at home because of the ban. Thus our church is constantly
reminded that the elders of the church as well as the area
administrative officers and the village mayors attempt to damage our
cause at every opportunity and wherever they can, and to keep us in
subjection even though we jointly [NB] enjoy the same privileges in
Russia. Everyone appeals to and places the blame upon everyone else, as
the contradiction between the church elders and the administrative
officer makes apparent. In the meantime we suffer many hardships:
politically we are not given the rights of free citizens; our domestic
economy has been severely curtailed because travel and trade both
within our district and to points outside have been adversely affected;
and our attempt to purchase land elsewhere has been made extremely
difficult because the local administrative office as well as the church
elders will not allow our members to obtain any travel passes, or if they
do, only after a great deal of trouble, as the above makes clear. In like
manner the Area Administrative Office seeks to hinder us in our religious
affairs. This has been recently demonstrated by the Administrative
Office in that it gave a verbal command to the village officers at
Elizabethal to hinder the marriage of our Minister Jakob Becker with the
Documentary Supplements
405
step-daughter of Franz Klaassen of Elizabethal (a member of our
church), which was to take place on September 30 in Elizabethal, a
command that was obeyed. Later Becker was detained for a whole week
in the Rudnerweide Colony under police supervision, and the Area
Administrative Office sent a written statement to village officers
directing them to make every effort to hinder marriages between
members of our church. [Compare XVII, ‘Marriage.’] The ministers of
the church, Heinrich Huebert, Jakob Becker. October 10, 1862,
Liebenau Colony.” [A further comparison should be made with the
document of December 30, 1863. ]
3. Further Difficulties and Travels in
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…