← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 400 (not an original page number)
Unit 400 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
te in his diary:
“. . . on September 16 we already left the Kuban and began our trip
home .... I did not get along too well with Claassen, for he was too
domineering .... On October 7 we arrived back home . . . .” Reimer, in
a letter to Cornelius Reimer: “Gnadenfeld, November 20, 1864 .... If I
had not said ‘A’ I would not say ‘B’ t for some of God’s children are
still here and others will continue to come . . . .” He never returned to
the Kuban: instead, together with some Old Colony brethren, he first
rented, then bought, land in the Ekaterinoslav region. He founded
Blumenau in the Alexandrov area, then, with his sons and other
brethren, Wiesenfeld in the Pavlograd area of the Ekaterinoslav
administrative region. He remained here until his death (1891) and
served as leader among the local Mennonite Brethren, but he travelled
little.
c) Difficult times in the settlement. Many of the other registered
settlers, especially from the Old Colony, followed Reimer’s example and
also returned. This gave rise to a great deal of irritation and painful
unpleasantness with the Caucasus officials who were annoyed by these
events, and would not admit any new settlers beyond the 100 originally
listed. Thus the settlement did not comprise 100 but only 67 full farms,
as well as a number of small farms of ten dessiatines. The settlement
consisted of the villages of Wohldemfuerst and Alexanderfeld, which in
the 1890s were renamed Velikokniashesk and Alexandrodar. Together
they constituted the Volost Velikokniashesk.
d) Amid all these awkward situations, vexations, and hardships,
Claassen would not be deterred. “There are new trials,” he wrote to his
wife in Liebenau on July 16, 1864, “which we must endure here. The
excessive amount of work required, and the scarcity on all sides make it
necessary for one to be careful that he does not become unloving or
concerned only about himself .... The Word of God says those who
want to become rich fall into temptation and traps, etc. ... I am not
surprised that things are going as they are . . . things will get even
worse, but then they will improve. The golden mountains must first turn
to copper, and one must leam to be content with that, and then better
414
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
times will come . On August 16: “. . . It seems to me that the
[spiritual] life is on a higher level in the Molotschna than here at the
Kuban, for here everyone is in need, and thus stinginess is really put to
the test. . . . The rest for the saints— God be thanked a thousand
times!— is not here on the Kuban [as many had often hoped, but not
Claassen], but in the city with golden streets .... Here on the Kuban I
have experienced only little joy. ‘Therefore, since we are surrounded by
so great a cloud of witnesses, let us . . .’ ’’ (Hebrews 12). On December 16:
“. . . I and Jakob have been rather ragged throughout the summer; we
really very much need to have ‘mother’ with us again. Well, t
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…