← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 401 (not an original page number)
Unit 401 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
he loving
Savior knows what is best for our souls .... Here at the Kuban many
brothers and sisters have been sick .... Almost all, with few
exceptions .... The brothers and sisters from the Old Colony have been
much affected. But it is good to endure all things in patience. At the
right time things will change . . . .”
e) In the oft-quoted letter of April 19, 1866, from Tiflis to the
Kuban Church, Claassen reports on many difficult events: “. . . Brothers
and sisters, you will know very well how things went during the time
when I was at the Kuban. If matters concerning the authorities arose,
you knew very well where to find me; also when land had to be
measured; and when help was needed [with money, etc] I was also
expected to provide a solution. I believe, brothers and sisters, that I
have served you to the best of my knowledge, and have worked for your
best as I understood it. I do not mean to imply that I have not also
made mistakes, for I am human and beset by weakness. Dear brothers
and sisters, you know how in that time we were oppressed by physical
needs; we had not taken enough money from home to travel to Tiflis,
and since I could not travel anyway, the money was used to buy
bread .... The brothers and sisters in the Molotschna were unhappy
because I was not travelling; you have letters to demonstrate that ....
The brothers and sisters from the Old Colony would have approved the
removal of my authority, etc. . . .”
§178 6. Document for Confirmation of the Mennonite Religious Rights of
the Kuban Settlers.
On November 19, 1865, Claassen arrived in Tiflis for the second time
and had to remain there until finally (!) on May 30, 1866, he received the
longed-for document in accordance with the instructions of His Highness
the Grand Prince, the Governor and Commander-in-Chief, whose deputy
delivered the document. Translation from the Russian.
Certificate
"In accordance with the decision of the assistant to the
Documentary Supplements
415
Commander-in-Chief of the army of the Caucasus, the civil authorities of
the mountains [Gorskoie Uprvleniie ] affirm that the Mennonites of the
administrative regions of Taurida and Ekaterinoslav, who have received
permission from both local and Caucasus authorities to settle on the left
bank of the Kuban opposite Staniza Nevinomysk, shall retain, in the
exercise of their religion, all those rights which the authorities have
granted them in their current places of residence. The authenticity of this
is certified by signature and the affixing of the crown seal. No. 2718.
May 30, 1866, Tiflis. In the absence of the Head of the Caucasus
Mountain Authority [Signature] Seal-Division Head [Signature].”
7. How heavy the weight of all these struggles, this sitting and §179
waiting, running and asking, especially the separation from family and
home, often was for Claassen is shown by this passage, together with
many others, from a letter from Tiflis to his wi
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…