← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 402 (not an original page number)
Unit 402 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
fe on April 19, 1866.
“Often I wonder why this lot has fallen to me. Why does the Lord not
distribute the load? Why must I be the one who is always far away from
his family? I also tell my Lord about this situation, and ask Him to
remember that I am dust and ashes. I tell my Lord that I am human,
that I have a heart filled with longing! You have given me a wife, and I
may not embrace her. You have given me children, and I may not
instruct them. My infant child I do not even know. My wife has a
husband, but she must bear the burdens alone; the children have a
father, but the little ones do not know him . . .
8. Short Report of a Part of the Molotschna and Einlage Mennonite § 180
Brethren Church now Settled on the Kuban.
This is given by the aged, venerable brother, Elder Daniel Fast, who
retired about 1902, under the date of April 29, 1902. a) “After Br.
Johann Claassen had received permission from the St. Petersburg
government to acquire land for settlement on the Kuban River, he and
Br. Heinrich Nickel went there in the fall of 1863 as the first pioneers. In
October they were followed by the brethren Abraham Peters [Ladekopp,
senior deacon], Simon Harms, Peter Martens and Schoenkovsky
[Claassen writes ‘Schinkovsky’], that is, four brethren without families
and with 36 cows. In November of that year Br. Claassen returned to the
Molotschna, but the four brethren stayed for the winter, prepared their
lands in 1864, and then returned to their families in the Molotschna.
Here they disposed of their farms, and took their families to their new
home on the Kuban. Br. Claassen and son [Jakob] also joined the group.
In the fall Cornelius Reimer and others also went. In 1865 the brethren
[Cornelius] Reimer and [Johann] Claassen each received another ten
dessiatines land for a garden along the stream Kusma, also called
416
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
Ovetschka. Here both of them, after they had gone back for their
families, settled temporarily, b) In 1866 Br. Claassen went to Tiflis and
received from the government [written] assurance that the Mennonite
rights of the Molotschna Mennonites also extended to the Kuban
settlers. In this year the other brethren from the administrative areas
Taurida and Ekaterinoslav also came here, 67 of 100 families, since the
difficulties of moving here frightened off 33 families. Thus there
remained land for only 67 families (at 65 dessiatines), settled on the left
bank of the Kuban River in the two colonies called Wohldemfuerst and
Alexanderfeld. They are close to each other and are today called
Velikokniashesk and Alexandrodar. . . (Cf. also #185ff.)
C. Documents Primarily Concerning the
Spiritual "Despotism” and the Excesses
of the "Exuberant Ones ”
(Supplement to Chapter XVIII)
§181 1. a) After the victory over Antinomianism in 1862 the excessive
exuberance had also receded (cf. above ‘‘Minutes of the Meeting of the
Ohrloff Ministers”). However, when a nu
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…