← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 462 (not an original page number)
Unit 462 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
five itinerant preachers were chosen, namely Eduard Leppke, Christian
Schmidt, Johann Wieler, Aron Lepp and Daniel Fast. For the first two of
these a salary of 400 rubles and for the last three 200 rubles was decided
upon because the latter wished to pursue their earthly occupations in addi-
tion to proclaiming the Word. Then it was decided that each itinerant
preacher should keep a diary which was to be sent quarterly to the secre-
tary, Br. Johann Friesen in Einlage, on the basis of which the committee
would prepare a quarterly newsletter and distribute the same according
§207
476
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
to their discretion, to the churches, so that the congregations become
aware of the labors of the brethren and that interest for missions be
awakened more.”
This concludes a very short but very significant chapter. We see
that the first annual conference established a precedent for decades, for
to this day the M.B. conference churches move virtually within the same
paths. This involuntarily occasions the question: has today’s itinerant
ministry grown proportionally? Then we had three congregations with ca.
600 members, today twelve churches (12 elder circuits with ca. 50 fellow-
ships observing communion and as many elders and leading ministers) and
over 6000 members (in Russia). But we must consider the foreign missions
in India, which is relatively large and demanding in personnel and money,
as a balancing factor. In addition the individual congregations often
engage in an unrecorded itinerant ministry (i.e. guest preaching) as has
always been the Mennonite custom.
XXIX.
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCHES IN RUSSIA FROM
1872/73 TO 1885: THAT IS, UNTIL THE 25TH ANNIVERSARY
A. The Einlage M.B. Church 1872/73-1885
§208 1. During this period this church played a dominant role because of
its energetic organizational work within the church itself as well as in the
whole M.B. Conference, just as Molotschna had done previously.
§209 2. A Baptist as “Super-Mennonite” (essentially based on Heinrich
Epp’s account). After 1872 Br. Eduard Leppke, 268 a Baptist from
Prussia, was active as itinerant minister in the M.B. Church [Br.
Wilhelm Schulz, also a Baptist, likewise worked here as itinerant
minister in 1873. In the region of the Don he ran into difficulty with the
police and left the country. He was a foreigner]. Eduard Leppke “came
to a different conviction” and no longer accepted the Baptist but rather
the Mennonite doctrinal teaching— indeed, in such an extreme form,
“that he erroneously taught that only nonresistant Christians can be
saved”; in other words, only Mennonites. However, he frequently carried
on a very blessed ministry by means of his winsome and attractive
private talks. Nevertheless, because of his extreme teaching he came into
conflict with the whole conference of the M.B. Church. In spite of this he
continued ministering for a long time both in the Einlage as well as
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…