← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 463 (not an original page number)
Unit 463 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
in
the Molotschna congregations, “desiring to undo the work of Liebig.”
§210 3. In addition to this Br. Abraham Unger resigned as elder in 1876
because of external pressures (of a financial nature, largely occasioned by
The M.B. Church 1873-1885
All
his book business in which he was engaged for Christian purposes, by his
ceaseless labor for the church without remuneration, and by the
boundless hospitality which he engaged in and which was taken
advantage of by many). The eldership was transferred to Br. Aron Lepp
by the church.
4. ‘‘Because Br. Leppke had already done preparatory work, Br. §211
Aron Lepp believed that the opportune moment had come to terminate
the fellowship with the Baptists [see above #201(2)]. A church meeting
was held in order to implement Leppke’s position, but the Lord did not
allow it. Now Leppke wrote disparaging letters regarding the church
leaders. He wanted to be the influential voice and partially succeeded.
The ‘divisive spirit’ again prevailed in the Einlage congregation.
Attention was again drawn to the “questionable aspects of the
Baptists,’’ so that Br. Liebig was not even allowed to participate in the
Lord's Supper on one occasion [while attending a conference as a visitor.
In spite of this, he was invited to preach the communion sermon, but he
resolutely declined]. The majority sided with . . . the brethren Leppke
and Lepp ; Brother Unger and a few other brethren came to stand alone.
A general conference was held in the Molotschna in 1876 at which time
this issue was also raised— supporting and opposing views were
expressed. During the discussion, however, there was a ‘silent chorus of
prayer’ among the brethren. Although no voice became audible, the
brethren cried to the Lord that He might decide [Johann Friesen from
Einlage, Johann Siemens from Andreasfeld, Johann Fast from Halbstadt-
Rueckenau and others were involved]. Then Br. Johann Siemens, the
influential minister from the Einlage congregation who otherwise had
also frequently opposed Abraham Unger on many issues, arose and
asked whether the conference would agree to postpone the issue for one
year in order to determine what the Lord would say to them in the
meantime.” This was accepted by the session. And thus it remained; the
issue was not raised again and therefore the policy remained in keeping
with the decision that had been made on the recommendation of Br.
Aron Lepp around 1870 in the Einlage congregation. Similarly, the
concluding statements of the 1873 Confession of Faith, printed in 1876,
stated that the M.B. Church and the Baptist Church were two separate
fellowships, but enjoyed spiritual fellowship 269 and fellowship at the
Lord’s Supper. (Cf. # 201 and #227 .)
5. According to Heinrich Epp, the Einlage M.B. Church discussed §212
issues pertaining to marriage at its meeting on December 27, 1879. The
problem was “how to deal with those children who wanted to be married
but who di
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…