← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 464 (not an original page number)
Unit 464 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
d not belong to any church. Should they be referred to the
Mennonite Church” or should M.B. ministers be allowed to perform the
478
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
§213
marriage vows? Many brethren felt these questions were too difficult to
resolve. “Why should we be concerned about outsiders,” some asked.
“But they are our children and we must seek what is best for them!”
“Let them go to the Mennonite Church.” “But if they feel it is wrong,
and they cannot join our church if they have not become Christians,
what then?” Brother Abraham Unger now made a recommendation
which then was accepted. The children of church members, who were not
yet baptized and did not belong to any church, but who desired to be
married, were to appear personally before the church and to sign a
written statement promising to continue attending church and to live a
quiet, morally upright, life. N.B.! Such persons thereby acknowledge
that they are associated with a church whose teaching and practice they
recognize to be truly Christian, but that they are not ‘members’ of the
same until by faith and baptism they too become ‘members’ of the
church. By this means many were prevented from a hypocritical
acceptance of baptism in the Mennonite congregations of our general
Mennonite brotherhood and, in most cases, a second baptism in their
mother church, the M.B. Church. It is one thing if children of the
Mennonite Church, who may not be true believers (although many are),
come to church in simple pious reverence according to the manner of
their parents ; but it is quite another when persons who are definitely not
eligible and who do not profess to be ready for baptism, still take the
step of baptism with a guilty conscience and with dishonesty on their
lips and ceremoniously make their confession on their knees before God
and men! And this is what some M.B. members are pleading for today?
As soon as baptism ceases to be a prerequisite for marriage in the
Mennonite Church of our common confession, the believers and the
leaders of that church will be absolved of their responsibility in marrying
young men and women who are baptized without genuine faith, contrary
to our common old-evangelical Anabaptist teaching, but whose life is
outwardly pious and whose testimony appears trustworthy, even though
no thorough investigation has been made. 270 But as long as baptism
opens the door to marriage, the responsibility is cast on the leaders of
the church and especially on the believers 271 in the church (see above
#237 and 241).
6. Confession of Faith of 1873/76
Early in 1873 an official from the Ministry (Colonel Bartholome)
came to the Mennonites of South Russia. He had come to deal with a
matter affecting the Mennonites as a whole, an issue relating to the new
military law which was to be imposed in 1874. This official also visited
the E ini age M.B. Church and desired to know what their relationship to
the Baptists was. Therefore t
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…