← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 475 (not an original page number)
Unit 475 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
n the Molotschna (see #211).
“Finally the following resolution, that there be communion fellowship
with the Baptists on a guest basis was agreed to.” (More correctly, to
adhere to the addendum to the Confession of Faith of 1873; compare
#201 and #211.)
4. Another issue having to do with differences in the understanding §222
of church doctrine arose because of the so-called “Holiness Movement,”
which was called into being through the influence of Pears al Smith and
the monthly publication, The Christian’s Pathway of Faith, 206 which
was distributed in Russia after 1874. “Some became quite enthusiastic
about the movement, but when word came a short time later that Pearsal
Smith had been obliged to withdraw from the public ministry for certain
reasons, excessive enthusiasm about the matter disappeared, serving the
cause only in the manner indicated by the Apostle Paul, Prove all
things, hold fast to that which is good.” Br. Philipp Isaak was especially
interested in this issue. “The ‘Holiness Movement’ did not call forth any
special corrective activity in the life of the church.”
5. a) In 1875, in late autumn, so-called general conferences were §223
held at some places because believers of various factions had raised the
question of how biblical unification could be brought about. The most
well attended of these conferences was held at the Rueckenau Church. Br.
Abraham Schellenberg was the leader and many of “our brethren”
participated. Many “Abraham Peters Brethren” 287 with their leader,
Abraham Peters of Friedensruh, as well as Minister Bernhard Harder
with many of the brethren from the Mennonite Church attended on that
occasion. Minister Richert and Geddert of Alexanderwohl, who were the
prominent believing ministers of the Mennonite Church at that time,
were not present. (They were already very busy with the question of
emigration, if not already in America?). Many of the questions that
492
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
occupied people’s minds at that time came up for discussion. For
example, regarding prayer: (whether it should be) silent or audible, in
what manner, whether sisters should be allowed to pray in the public
services, and other concerns. The question of baptism also came up, and
how intimate fellowship could be achieved. "Regarding the latter, our
brethren tried, on the basis of God’s Word, to prove that if we are
walking according to God’s revealed will and submitting unreservedly to
His Word, we must practice baptism on faith in the Lord Jesus
according to the example of the apostles. No proof to the contrary from
God’s Word was offered.’’ “After lengthy discussion on the point, dear
Brother Bernhard Harder arose and addressed his brethren from the
Mennonite Church in the following manner: What do you think, my
brothers, if we should feel that the Lord desires of us that we should be
baptized in the river, would we not want to do it? On my part, I would be
ready. How abo
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…