← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 476 (not an original page number)
Unit 476 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
ut you? It appeared as though it was not taken seriously.
... Yet be that as it may, many of those present were convinced of the
correctness of baptism on faith, and in the following year, 1876, 80
persons, including many who had attended this conference, were
baptized.”
b) In his travelogue of August 16-November 16, 1876 (cf. # 198 ), Br.
Abraham Unger writes about this conference as follows:
“We were invited to participate in a conjoint conference with the
brethren from the Mennonite Church at Rueckenau on September 6.
Several of us went. The fairly large church was filled to capacity with
brethren. Many things were discussed and decisions reached. The chief
concern was to meet and discuss things in love, and not to quarrel
regarding different positions, because much hurt had already been
inflicted thereby in God’s kingdom. Various subjects were calmly
discussed. Br. Abraham Schellenberg chaired the conference, and at the
conclusion it was decided to hold a s imilar conference on the coming
November 29. I cannot see any danger for our church in such an
assembly, because on the path of love, truth must prevail, and God’s
Word is truth.
‘Look out upon the springtime fields
Walk through the colored land of flowers:
Where in the garden or the woods
Is one leaf like another?
The rose bickers not with the aster,
Nor the oak with the beechwood :
For each one knows: we bloom and wilt
By the mellow light of one sun! ’
The M.B. Church 1873-1885
493
A few pages later the dear deceased one quotes the following poem
to chide religious intolerance in a mild way:
‘Behold the folly of your Mends
Exalted Head, with sympathy,
And build a church unto yourself
According to your masterplan!
There with raptured souls you keep
The great communion feast.
O do not let our foe be missing
At that great banquet hall in heaven!’ ” 288
6. On October 2, 1876, the following brethren were elected to preach
the Word of God: Franz Nickel, Wilhelm Loewen, Klaas Enns, Peter
Siemens and David Schellenberg. Peter Siemens (see above XXV,
footnote 16) never formally accepted his election to the ministry, although
he did preach from time to time. David Schellenberg, twenty-four years
old at the time of his election, had ministered with enthusiasm and under
the blessing of God in the Sunday school for several years. He
commented: “It [the election to the ministry] came very unexpectedly. I
did not consider myself to possess the gift for it, but I could not
decline.”
7. The first unsuccessful attempt to build a church. “It was God’s
purpose to bless His little flock. But experience teaches us that times of
blessing are preceded by times of testing. The purchase of a small farm
in Ladekopp became a test of brotherly love.” It was the strong desire of
a number of brethren in Ladekopp that Christian Schmidt, the itinerant
minister, should live there and that the church should have a
meeting-place there. But as a pla
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…