← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 477 (not an original page number)
Unit 477 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
ce in which to meet, Ladekopp was far
from central in the Molotschna Colony, and Br. Schmidt did not want to
live in the isolated building provided, because he became the victim of
thieves again and again. In addition, a marked decline in land prices was
caused by large numbers emigrating from the Molotschna. This resulted
in tne loss of two thousand five hundred rubles to the church. This was
not easy for the, as yet, small church, and the feeling of dissatisfaction
was great, especially in the light of the absolute fruitlessness of the
expense. The painful collections for the project took six years, beginning
in 1873.
8. The Church Buildings in Rueckenau. a) When the undertaking in
Ladekopp failed, a few brethren, particularly Philipp Isaak of Tiege,
decided to buy a building privately for the same purpose in Rueckenau,
which was much more centrally located in the Molotschna Colony; the
§224
494
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
building was then to be remodelled and rented to the believers. This was
in the year 1874. The building, now known as the ‘‘old meeting house,”
had been a tavem(!) for many years, a fact that had caused the ethically
scrupulous people of the village much concern and offense. The village
a dmini strator at the time was Gerhard Epp, a serious and pious man,
who soon thereafter became a faithful member of the M.B. Church.
Precisely on the day that Abraham Schellenberg, Philipp Isaak, and
Johann Friesen came to him to request his consent for the project, Epp
had cried to God from the depths of his soul for counsel and help because
of this village plague, the tavern. The coming of the brethren with their
plan was for him an answer to prayer and an indication of God’s
working. Because of Epp’s influence in the village community and the
people’s opposition to the tavern, the permission of the Rueckenau
village council, allowing the establishment of a meeting house for the
Mennonite Brethren in the Molotschna, though initially on a private
basis, came through with unexpected ease. (The inhabitants of
Rueckenau at that time were members of the Mennonite Church in
Margenau.) So now the “tavern” was to be transformed into a “house of
prayer.” God blessed the undertaking. One partition after another had to
be removed from the building which in those beginning years was
considered a rather large one. Finally a wing was added for the church
custodian, and the entire interior space was used for worship. In an ever
increasing way the “old tavern,” now the “new church,” became filled
with worshippers. Soon the congregation bought the building from the
brethren, and everyone rejoiced that the Lord had given them a center
for worship. At that time only the general assembly on the first Sunday
of the month convened here. On the other Sundays and for the special
festivals the meetings rotated from village to village wherever the
“brethren” lived. This was done according to an “assembly list
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…