← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 478 (not an original page number)
Unit 478 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
” that
was set up each year. This is an old custom in the Molotschna, still
practiced by the “Kleine Gemeinde."
b) “One could almost apply Acts 9:31 to the stance of the church at
that time. The church . . . had peace and was built up; and walking in
the fear of the Lord and in the comfort of the Holy Spirit it was
multiplied. When one reads letters written by leading brethren at the
time, or observes the courage and tireless activity which the brethren
generated, though their number as compared to the present number was
small, one finds that the power of God was great in the church.” “The
attendance at meetings increased to the extent that the brethren had
already decided in the autumn of 1882 to build a new church building in
Rueckenau. 289 For this purpose a sum of money was immediately
gathered and still more was pledged. The Lord gave the brethren courage
and strength to proceed with the task. That same aut umn some of the
The M.B. Church 1873-1885
495
preparations were begun. In the summer of 1883 the church was built
under the supervision of Br. Johann Koop of Fuerstenau.” (The interior
dimensions were 84 x 42 x 141/2 feet; unfortunately the ceiling was too
low, something that had been predicted by many but without effect.) "On
October 2 of the same year it was solemnly dedicated as a place of
worship for God’s glory and for the proclamation of the precious Gospel.
Many attended the dedication service.” The house of prayer, constructed
from the most solid material, together with the barns 290 and a massive
brick fence, was built at a cost of eight thousand five hundred rubles. 291
The cost would have been much greater if much of the labor, such as the
transport of materials to the building site, had not been done gratis, and if
the construction supervisor and the other brethren had not been so faithful
in their punctuality and orderliness. When the building was dedicated,
two-thirds of its cost had already been covered, many of the farmers who
owned full-sized farms having donated two hundred rubles or more.
c) “In order to meet the total cost of the building, the congregation
unanimously and with willing hearts agreed that each would give to the
building fund according to the amount of farmland owned. Whoever had
a full farm would give the proceeds of one dessiatine, the owner of a
half-farm would give the proceeds of half a dessiatine, and the owner of
a small farm, the proceeds of a quarter dessiatine. The money was to be
given to Gerhard Epp, who was treasurer. Artisans or businessmen who
were not landholders in turn paid a proportionate sum for this purpose.
This has remained a custom to the present day. In this manner a number
of churches have been built or remodelled in the Molotschna
Colony with assistance from the treasury. In addition, subsidies have
been given to build churches in the Memrik, Samara and Orenburg
provinces.”
9. Emigration to America of Leaders and Members of
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…