← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 479 (not an original page number)
Unit 479 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
the
Mennonite Brethren Church in the Molotschna. (Cf. here the special
section, "Non-resistance Issue and Emigration.”) a) The time had
come, according to David Schellenberg, for the Mennonites of
Russia to make a decision concerning service to the state as an
alternative to military service. The ensuing restlessness resulted in an
emigration movement to America, despite the fact that Adjutant
General (later Count) Totleben, sent by the Tsar in highest official
capacity, attempted through personal intervention to dissuade the
Mennonites from leaving. And so many of the members of the M.B.
Church decided to leave the country, that had till then been their father-
land, in order to establish new homes across the seas. (It must be
mentioned that the reports from the Einlage congregation do not make
mention of this matter. Originally fewer members emigrated from there, 292
§225
496
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
and then none as significant for the life of the church as was the case
in the Molotschna.) The pain of parting, both among those going and
those remaining, was very great. Many brothers and sisters were
especially sorry to see Elder Abraham Schellenberg emigrate. “However,
he felt released from his responsibilities here. He attempted to set
everything in order as best he could. He was convinced that God had
given him another task. When he was asked to justify leaving the
church, he intimated that among other things he was comforted by the
fact that Br. Johann Regehr (Klippenfeld) and Br. Poettker
(Fuerstenau), ministers of the Word, and Franz Janzen (Pordenau) and
Cornelius Neufeld (Neukirch), deacons, and a third of the members of the
church, were going with him.” 293 To the author, Br. Abraham
Schellenberg gave the following reasons for leaving: first, his concern,
even conviction, that religious freedom would be taken from all alien
church denominations, a view he later declared to have been in error;
secondly, that he had “become too heavy a burden to his brethren in his
capacity as a leader.” The honorable and dear brother possesses a large
measure of energy and ability to dominate. In America he had a similar
experience. This he shared with the author in the Kuban area, where they
met in 1886-1887 when Schellenberg returned from America for a visit
eight years after emigrating. He admitted humbly and with joy that the
blossoming of the M.B. Church, especially in Rueckenau, had exceeded
all his expectations. He and others would rather be here and would have
returned, if their homes, duties and interests had not been in America,
and if they could have regained their Mennonite rights (which is
impossible).
b) The regulating of the spiritual ministry by Abraham
Schellenberg before his emigration. Under the leadership of Abraham
Schellenberg, a council of brethren met in Rueckenau on December 27,
1878. Br. Johann J. Fast, who had previously lived in Schoenau and
Halbstadt and died in R
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…