← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 575 (not an original page number)
Unit 575 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
the question of having the right to
emigrate for conscience sake. It is from this standpoint that I implore
you to test this matter before God. Save yourselves, I beg you, from a
viewpoint which would imply that your migration constitutes a divine
judgment for this land which necessitates your leaving! If others
evaluate the circumstances in that way then let them justify themselves
if they can. You, however, must not give occasion for such
thoughts— they would seriously threaten your innocence and sincerity
before God and man.
“Is it possible that the truth may be exactly reversed? That in the
circumstances of your submission to compulsory military service there
may be a godly discipline to be learned which you would not do well to
overlook? [Is it possible] that, much rather, you should humbly accept
this discipline and believe that the God of all mercy will respect your
obedience and allow you and all your congregations to harvest the
peaceable fruit of righteousness, to be strengthened in the Spirit and also
to strengthen that which is in danger of dying?
Your Theodor Hans”
St. Petersburg, January 16, 1873
b) “Dear Brothers!
“I recall making the promise to notify you when the bill which is so
important to both of us (concerning the compulsory military service law)
would come before the Imperial Council. Today I am in a position to
write you.
"Count Heyden, the well-known chief of the Commission had
promised to notify you through me as to the time when a written petition
from you to the Imperial Council would be most timely and effective. I
have waited until the present for news from Count Heyden but without
results. Now I believe I cannot wait any longer without adversely
affecting your interests.
“Naturally it depends upon what your opinion is presently. Minister
Valuiev, as you know, counselled that you entrust your cause to His
Majesty the Tsar’s good will alone and spare yourselves further steps
since your position is sufficiently known to the Tsar and other high
officials. Should you, dear brothers, want to follow this guidance, then
you would have to give up on a petition to the Imperial Council. I do not
know if your conscience will permit this course of action and especially if
your dear congregations will be satisfied with so very inactive a period of
waiting.
"Therefore, it is my duty to inform you that in case you intend to
present your concerns before the Imperial Council, the time may well be
602
THE STATE
§279
here to set the machinery in motion. The petition to the Imperial Council
would have to be written in the Russian language and addressed directly
to the president of the Council, His Imperial Highness, Grand Duke
Konstantin Nikolaievitsch. Either the petition can be sent to the Grand
Duke through the regular channels of the postal service— or, you may
want to consider delivering the petition personally via two delegates who
would, however, have good comman
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…