← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 576 (not an original page number)
Unit 576 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
d of the Russian language in order to
speak with the Grand Duke. I do not consider the personal delivery,
however, to be of absolute necessity.
“What I have already said to you orally I must repeat here. It is of
greatest significance that your petition to the Imperial Council be in the
form of an all-inclusive general declaration on behalf of the Mennonites,
that it not be signed by only a few individual congregations or elders
but, rather, that it give the impression of a collective petition which
expresses the opinion of the total Mennonite community.
“Should your viewpoint, meanwhile, have changed in the sense that
the preponderant majority of your congregation and its members would
want to comply with the mild form of military duty as it has been
afforded you— then, of course, such a petition to the Imperial Council
would become unnecessary.
“You know, dear brothers, my position toward you and your cause.
I repeat that I would rejoice with all my heart if you would remain in
Russia. Russia needs you and the responsibility which you have received
from God for this country is a great one.
“Well, God counsel you with His Holy Spirit concerning this
question and guide your decision for your best interest and for the honor
of His Name. Greet your congregations with heartfelt love from your
brother.
Theodor Hans,
Minister of the Brethren Church”
2) “Memorandum of the Mennonites to the Government” presented
by their deputies to the Adjutant General, the Count von Totleben, in
St. Petersburg, November 15, 1875 (Taken from the same source as
# 278 ):
"Based on the truly paternal favor shown to us by Your Majesty, our
most gracious Lord and Emperor, through the gracious acceptance of our
petitions and desires, which we had the good fortune to present to Your
Majesty through His Excellency, the Adjutant General von Totleben,
and based upon the permission granted our most humble petition, to be
able to voice our desires in a separate memorandum as to which form of
service, among those permitted us, would be most suited to our
conditions and most preferred by us, we venture in the name of our
Military Service and Emigration
603
congregations to voice our most humble desires and petitions in the
following:
“1. After due consideration we and our congregations have arrived at
the conclusion that the service in the forestry camps of Southern Russia
would, for our conditions and abilities, be the most suitable form of
service, and we would send our youths to serve in this fashion without
hesitation. We would find it especially desirable were we to be able to
plant new forests and administer them according to the regulations
determined by the government through administrators drawn from our
own midst. First of all, this would contribute greatly in calming our
congregations, for we dare neither to hide it from ourselves nor keep it a
secret from the government that the question of emigration is,
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…