Avakum
Checking archive
← Research Library
Indexed source

THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911

Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.

2,951 passagesText fragments 1–984; these are not original page numberslanguage not recorded
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet

Text fragment 98 (not an original page number)

Unit 98 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
Exact extracted unit
Comies and others, and with the highest colonial authorities, the Supervisory Co mmis sion in Odessa. This resulted in the removal of, 10 or more correctly stated, the enforced resignation or withdrawal, of two of their elders, Warkentin and later Heinrich Wiens. However, the church still remained functional and later organized itself under three elders, and is known today as the combined churches of Lichtenau-Petershagen, Margenau, Schoensee, Pordenau and Alexanderkrone. 11 Originally it was as orthodox as the Kleine Gemeinde, which remained wholly Flemish in its teaching and church polity, whereas Bernhard Fast’s congregation in Ohrloff was considered to be bent on innovation and apostasy from the true Christian-Mennonite faith of the fathers. Rigid orthodoxy, aversion to education, opposition to cultural improvement and the absence of a deep piety had long been the distinguishing characteristics of the masses of this large church. Today the intellectual and spiritual boundaries have been largely displaced and erased. Consequently this verdict is no longer applicable, or at best only conditionally so. (Cf. “Documentary Supplement,” #59 & 61.) 4. Bernhard Fast’s very small congregation in Ohrloff thus became the progressive congregation both in cultural and partly also in religious matters, for a long time working closely with the Rudnerweide and Alexanderwohl congregations (#59 & 69). However, the fact that its members occupied positions of highest responsibility in the offices of the colony for many years during the time of Johann Comies, thus exercising a strong influence on the higher authorities, led to difficulties. However, the Ohrloff Elder Bernhard Fast, ordinarily a congenial, godly and intelligent man, often evidenced tendencies favoring ecclesiastical politics and a strong hierarchy, thus alienating the Frisian congregation of Rudnerweide, the old Flemish Alexanderwohl congregation as well as Gnadenfeld later on, so that these eventually gave more support to the 96 IN RUSSIA 1789-1860 “large congregation” in matters pertaining to the colony, where affairs of the church and local politics always tended to become intermingled. §39 5. It is Ohrloff’s great merit to have decisively worked toward progress in church and school, fostering a new vitality even before the Gnadenfeld congregation exerted its leading role in those areas in 1835-40. The founding of the Ohrloff Association School in the early 1820s was one of the first energetic efforts undertaken to improve the education of the Mennonites in Russia. §40 6. Tobias Voth, son of a minister in the Brenkenhofswalde-Franztal Mennonite congregation near Driesen in Mark Brandenburg (later “Gnadenfeld” in Russia), had, through his own efforts, become a well-qualified teacher and held a very desirable teaching position in a West Prussian city. In the early 1820s he was called by the "Ohrloff School Society” to open its new pr

Source excerpts

[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…