← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
Colonel V. A. Pashkov and the Late Nineteenth-Century Protestant Movement in Russia, Jan M. Surer, 1999
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 7 (not an original page number)
Unit 7 of 54. Only the selected source passage is shown.
e Lutheran community there; a few aristocratic
families had had Catholic sympathies.
In his account of the movement itself, we learn of the
groundwork laid by Bible distribution in the 1860's, of
charitable works undertaken by the new converts, including
Pashkov's tract-printing society, of early government
opposition (which ironically helped the movement to spread to
the masses, as Pashkov in particular withdrew to his estates
to work there unhindered), of the harsh persecutions in the
1880's and 1890's of all sectarians (although those of the
upper classes received lighter punishments), and of the
Pashkovite movement's decline from that time. Joining in the
tradition of linking the movement's history to the commentary
upon it made by Tolstoy and others, Heier also provides a
detailed study of various novelists' responses, including
those of lesser known writers such as P. D. Boborykin and
Elizabeth Ward de Charriere.
Heier's analysis of the reasons for Pashkovism's decline
16 Edmund Heier, Religious Schism in the Russian Aristocracy
1860-1900: Radstockism and Pashkovism . Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague,
1970.
11
cites the loss of the movement's leaders to government-imposed
exile, the subsuming of Pashkovism in the strong current of
the Russian Baptist movement, and the persecutions just
mentioned. As for any direct results of the movement, Heier
credits thinkers closer to Orthodoxy, such as Vladimir
Solov'ev, rather than the Pashkovite religious revival, for
inspiring the back-to-church movement at the turn of the
century. 17 Yet he does note the Pashkovites' influence in
spurring Orthodoxy to reform and their pioneering efforts
towards overcoming class divisions.
But Heier's decision to limit himself to the evangelical
movement among the aristocracy leads him to emphasize the
decline of Pashkovism at the expense of noting the continued
influence of evangelicalism in the Baptist and Evangelical
movements. The works of Andrew Blane, Walter Kolarz, J. C.
Pollock, and Hans Brandenburg, among others, help to remedy
this. In addition to recounting the nineteenth-century
beginnings of the doctrinally related Stundist and Baptist
movements, they pay significant attention to the Baptists' and
Evangelicals' status at the time of the Bolshevik revolution
and to their continuance into the Soviet period. 18
The Soviet scholar A. I. Klibanov's thorough study of
17 Heier, pp. 25-26.
18 The works not yet cited are : Hans Brandenburg, The Meek
and the Mighty: The Emergence of the Evangelical Movement in Russia
( Christen im schatten der Macht . Wuppertal, 1974), Mowbrays,
London, 1974; Walter Kolarz, Religion in the Soviet Union .
Macmillan, London, 1961; and J. C. Pollock, The Faith of the
Russian Evangelicals . McGraw-Hill, New York, 1964.
12
sectarianism also covers the wider evangelical movement. 19 His
work is useful for its Marxist perspective, which places
considerable emphasis on th
Source excerpts
[Colonel V. A. Pashkov and the Late Nineteenth-Century Protestant Movement in Russia, Jan M. Surer, 1999. Исследование жизни и деятельности полковника В. А. Пашкова, ключевой фигуры протестантского движения в России конца XIX века. Анализирует его влияние на религиозные и социальные ас] Colonel V. A. Pashkov and the Late Nineteenth-Century Protestant Movement in Russia Jan M. Surer A thesis submitted in fulfillment of requirements for the degree of M.Phil. in Russian and East European Studies. Christ Church, Oxford, 1 May 1999 Acknowledgments Many people have contributed to the completion of this thesis. Professor G. S. Smith, my university supervisor; Dr. J. A. E. Curtis, my interim supervisor; and Rev. M. Everitt, my thesis adviser, gave generously of their time and guidance at various…