← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
Colonel V. A. Pashkov and the Late Nineteenth-Century Protestant Movement in Russia, Jan M. Surer, 1999
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 8 (not an original page number)
Unit 8 of 54. Only the selected source passage is shown.
e sectarians' material conditions
as key factors in the movement's origin and development. He
also stresses the socio-economic differences between the
largely upper-class Pashkovites (Evangelicals) of northern
Russia and the Stundists and Baptists of the south and between
leaders and followers within each group. Klibanov's approach
thus raises the guestion of the socio-economic aspects of
these sectarian movements in the changing conditions of post-
Emancipation Russia.
19 A. I. Klibanov, History of Religious Sectarianism in Russia
(1860s-1917 ) ( Istoriya reliaioznoao sektantstva v Rossii . Moscow,
1965), trans. by Ethel Dunn, ed. by Stephen P. Dunn, Pergamon
Press, Oxford, 1982.
Chapter 2
In Search of a New Social Order
The Pashkovite movement began at a time of sweeping
change in Russia. The emancipation of the serfs in 1861 and
the government's increasing support of industrialization were
gradually eroding the old order and creating new social
groups. And with these changes came increasing discontent
against the dying order and the autocratic government which
had created it. A major characteristic of the old order had
been a stratification of society into legal estates
( sosloviya ) on which one's personal and civil rights were
based. Much of the early revolutionary protest was initially
directed against this system and its social and economic
legacy.
Legal estate and privilege
Nobility, clergy, townsmen, and serfs were the four major
estates in the nineteenth century. Entrance to the nobility
under the civil service system of Peter I (1682-1725) was a
reward for government service in the military or the civil
administration. The fourteen levels of the Table of Ranks
measured advancement in both services. In 1722, civil
officials who reached the eighth rank and all military
officers acquired hereditary noble status. 1 By the second half
1 Patrick de Gmeline, Dictionnaire de la Noblesse Russe ,
Editions Contrepoint, Paris, 1978, p. 63.
13
14
of the nineteenth century, the qualifying rank had been raised
to the fourth from the top. 2 Nonhereditary or "personal" noble
status, a sub-category of the noble estate, was also possible.
Although such status did not devolve upon one's children, it
did permit inclusion in the highest legal estate, which
entailed certain privileges. Foremost among these was the
right to own inhabited property, i.e., land and serfs.
Other privileges enjoyed by the nobility included several
exemptions, namely from the poll tax, compulsory labor
service, military conscription, and corporal punishment. 3 The
clergy estate and the "distinguished citizens" segments of the
urban estate also enjoyed these exemptions. Additional noble
privileges were the right to a trial by a jury of their peers
and the right to travel. Although they were not the only
estate which could enter the civil service, they enjoyed
"preferential treatment" once embarked on such a car
Source excerpts
[Colonel V. A. Pashkov and the Late Nineteenth-Century Protestant Movement in Russia, Jan M. Surer, 1999. Исследование жизни и деятельности полковника В. А. Пашкова, ключевой фигуры протестантского движения в России конца XIX века. Анализирует его влияние на религиозные и социальные ас] Colonel V. A. Pashkov and the Late Nineteenth-Century Protestant Movement in Russia Jan M. Surer A thesis submitted in fulfillment of requirements for the degree of M.Phil. in Russian and East European Studies. Christ Church, Oxford, 1 May 1999 Acknowledgments Many people have contributed to the completion of this thesis. Professor G. S. Smith, my university supervisor; Dr. J. A. E. Curtis, my interim supervisor; and Rev. M. Everitt, my thesis adviser, gave generously of their time and guidance at various…